Motherboard ReviewsPC Hardware Reviews

Zotac H55ITX-C-E Motherboard

« Page 3 | Page 5 »

Testing the Zotac H55ITX-C-E

  In the following tables, the result in the darker cell is the better score.

PCMark Vantage
  Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
Marks 6880 6829
Memories 5816 5977
TV & Movies 4119 4209
Gaming 7307 7504
Music 6161 6126
Communications 8934 9948
Productivity 5625 6016
HDD 3468 3373

  Looking at the above table, we see that the Asus showed to carry the higher averages for the most part. The Zotac H55ITX-C-E did manage to achieve the highest Marks. In the end though, there really isn’t that much difference, and it’s to see that the Zotac performed as well as it did.

Cinebench R11.5
  Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
Single-Core (pts) 1.08 1.09
Multi-Core (pts) 2.76 2.78

  In Cinebench, we see the Asus again shows to have a slight advantage.

GraySky X264 HD Benchmark
  Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
Pass 1 (FPS) 80.89 80.74
Pass 2 (FPS) 15.44 15.47
Pass 1 (kb/s) 3912.26 3912.26
Pass 2 (kb/s) 3961.37 3961.27

  GraySky video encoding benchmark actually makes 4 passes, but to save of space I’ve opted to show only two for the comparison.  As we can see, the two rigs are fairly close to each other in performance here.

Heaven Benchmark v2.0
  Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
FPS 42.53 42.93
Score 1071.67 1081.67

  In Unigine’s Heaven Benchmark v2.0, the Asus configuration is taking a slight lead again but by a very small margin.

LAN Speed
  Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
Read (Mbps) 35.35 28.43
Write (Mbps) 44.75 54.47

  In the LAN Speed test the Zotac board was able to achieve the better read speed, while the Asus board took the better write speed. 

HD Tune Pro – SATA Read / Write
    Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
Avg. Transfer Rate (MB/Sec) Read 170.70 171.50
Write 56.53 59.00
Access Time (ms) Read 0.10 0.10
Write 0.27 0.33
Burst Rate (MB/sec) Read 178.10 186.57
Write 183.07 184.77

  Using HD Tune Pro to check the SATA performance we find the Asus in the lead for the most part. I really doubt that many users will even notice this small of a difference.

HD Tune Pro – USB 2.0 Read / Write
    Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
Avg. Transfer Rate (MB/Sec) Read 34.87 32.80
Write 32.47 28.40
Access Time (ms) Read 17.10 17.10
Write 17.20 17.20
Burst Rate (MB/sec) Read 28.30 27.70
Write 28.30 27.70

  Using HD Tune Pro to check the SATA performance we find the Asus in the lead for the most part. I really doubt that many users will even notice this small of a difference.

HD Tune Pro – USB 3.0 Read / Write
    Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
Avg. Transfer Rate (MB/Sec) Read 49.40 49.40
Write 48.60 48.70
Access Time (ms) Read 16.90 16.87
Write 17.00 17.10
Burst Rate (MB/sec) Read 62.50 79.00
Write 62.50 76.57

  Kicking over to USB 3.0 performance, we see the tables turn a little bit. Now we did manage to get a decent difference in burst rate, but for average file transfers we are still pretty close. The only users that are really going to see any difference in the speeds are those that transfer tons of files all the time.

Dirt 2
  Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
1680 x 1050
Min FPS 60.65 65.52
Average FPS 84.11 86.81
1920 x 1200
Min FPS 56.01 57.30
Average FPS 74.18 75.34

  In the DirectX 11 game Dirt 2, we see the Asus taking the lead again. We are only talking about a few FPS at both the 1680 x 1050 and 1920 x 1200 resolutions.

FarCry 2
  Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
1680 x 1050
Min FPS 53.13 56.45
Average FPS 79.55 81.38
1920 x 1200
Min FPS 52.91 49.55
Average FPS 75.42 78.58

  FarCry 2 is utilizing DirectX 10 and shows us nothing new. The Asus configuration is pushing out a few more FPS at both resolutions. 

System Power Consumption
  Zotac H55ITX-C-E Asus P7H55D-M Evo
Idle 83.0 87.8
Load 261.0 259.0

  Even when looking at the system power consumption between the two configurations. The Zotac manages to come in at the lowest with 83W at idle, while the Asus manages to pull the lowest peak load consumption with 259.0W at peak load. The idle measurement was taken with both configurations running at idle with no extra applications running. The peak measurement was taken after completing all tests on each configuration. 

Previous page 1 2 3 4 5Next page
Show More
Please Support Us, Every Purchase Helps Keep the Site Going Please Support Us, Every Purchase Helps Keep the Site Going
Back to top button